I'm pretty neutral about Larkin going in. His career looks a lot like Alan Trammel's to me, who I'm ok with also going in the Hall but figured Trammel would have gone first. Speaking of unloved Tigers, it was good to see Morris increase this year as I think he belongs and will exentually get in. I was a little surprised to see McGwire's numbers drop. The only new news this past year about McGwire is that he apologized, took a job as a hitting coach, and won the World series in that capacity so dropping didn't make a whole lot of sense to me. I've seen a lot of comments about writer's holding out Clemens and Bonds, too, which will be interesting. For the record, I believe a HOF without Clemens and Bonds would be an absolute farce.
Joe Posnanski of Sports Illustrated.com is one of my favorite writers regarding Hall of Fame voting, and wrote a real interesting piece about the history of the voting and how the upcoming dilemma has sort of played out several times in the past:
http://joeposnanski.si.com/2012/01/03/the-future-and-past-of-the-hall-of-fame/ Check out his archive for other very detailed studies on the subject.