by Centerfield » February 18th, 2009, 12:33 am
I make it a point to contact the seller immediately when seeing a glove of interest and explaining to them the likelihood of potential interest and that it would be a mistake of monumental proportions to end the auction early. This seems to have helped with the listings continuing to fruition. Perhaps if a seller gets multiple notes like this from various people, they would be less inclined to end their auction and sell to these “bottom feeders”.
On a separate note, I’ve truly become disgusted with eBay in general, forcing us to use Pay Pal is the last straw with me. I understand that new finds will likely materialize there, but we all should begin to use the buy/sell portion of this forum for the majority of collector-to-collector transactions. The only problem I see with that is that the random person who happens to be online when something is listed for sale, gets it. An auction feature on this site would be great, but probably not feasible. So, this is the idea I came up with…
What are your thoughts about a separate section of the forum for closed bid auctions? It would work something like this; a seller would post a photo, description, email address and auction end time and interested buyers send one email with their highest bid. After the set time has expired, say five or seven days, the seller sells the glove to the highest bidder or decides to retain it (if there is a serious lack of interest).
Besides not having to deal with eBay any longer for gloves moving within the hobby, we’ll all save on the transaction fees. As for a feedback system, simply post any problems that arise and let the group determine the outcome (or the moderator). If something goes seriously wrong with a transaction, the person causing the problem will be known to the community for all to be aware for future dealings. The only negative, I see, is that since it is a blind format, the auction game changes. You are forced to think about your bid instead of sniping and paying a minimal amount over the next highest bidder. Furthermore, it would be left up to the two involved in the transaction whether to reveal the ending price to the rest of us.
Any thoughts?