vintagebrett wrote:I'm against making offers to end auctions early and I'm also anti-interfering with a deal that has been completed.
GloveCrazy wrote:I'd love to see this particular glove offered to the original winner (only if they didn't talk them into ending it early) or the first person who sent an email suggesting that they SHOULD let it ride (only if it had no offer)
Rickybulldog wrote:GloveCrazy wrote:I'd love to see this particular glove offered to the original winner (only if they didn't talk them into ending it early) or the first person who sent an email suggesting that they SHOULD let it ride (only if it had no offer)
Are you serious on the second one? I say original winner or let it ride auction style. Also, I'm not understanding how paying quicker for an item ensures completion on the deal especially in this case if it had been done. Money can be refunded and I've seen it happen before.
Return to Vintage Glove of the Month
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests