by ebbets55 » August 21st, 2008, 2:55 am
Hmmm. Not good. On the flipside, if sellers can no longer require money orders, I'm in. I will not bid in an auction where a seller demands a money order only. Screw them. This practice removes bidders from their auctions. This will open up a bunch more auctions for me.
Unfortunately, I got suckered into the PayPal Merchant Account or Premier Account years ago. Someone tried to pay for one of my auctions with a credit card through PayPal, not with PayPal funds, and PayPal informed me that I couldn't accept the guy's payment unless I upgraded my regular account to a Premier account, which charges a fee structure of over 3%. Thousands of dollars in PayPal fees later...all because I wanted to accept the guy's payment without having to go back to him for an alternate payment method and probably risking negative feedback.
Yes, all these things, coupled with anonymous bidding, pretty much blows. Let's do some simple math on a typical glove auction that sells for $50 and see how much it really costs the sellers, as I'm now curious.
Insertion Fee using eBay's picture hosting like I do on a $9.99 starting price = $1.10. The glove sells for $50. eBay hammer fee = $3.07 (8.75% of the first $25 and 3.50% of the next $25). PayPal fee is 2.90% + $.30 = $1.75. So $1.10+$3.07+$1.75 = $5.92 or 11.825%. If I wanted to use a reserve of $50, then that would have cost $2.00 or another 4% making the glove auction 15.85%. With having to snap the photos, fill out the eBay forms, answer all the questions, invoice the buyers, receive or followup on payment, packaging the item, having to go to the post office for that one guy who wants insurance or the one guy from Canada, which requires all the customs forms, waiting in line for 45 minutes and driving time (1.5 to 2 hours total time away from work), it hardly seems worth it.
JD