Yes, cringer, I have a friend who likes to make me put my hand in cringers that have better linings than they look ... ew.
And snicket, I have a friend who has lots of snickets, though I'm sure someone probably would say that about me as well. I'll trade some of mine, though.
Along the cringer and perplaced lines I'm thinking
artifact, which is a very tough to get glove that you are happy to have, know that you will probably never be able to upgrade (cost or rarity reasons), but are afraid to let anyone touch it for condition reasons. Heck, you are afraid to touch the darn thing. I'm sure my eventual fingerless will be an artifact, or maybe a
caveman?
Some glove flaws:
- censored -- where someone has crossed out or blacked out a name
- Hancocked - a big name on the front
- puddle - big oil stain
- Gorbachov - glove with a big stain/blemish up near the top
- graffitied - ink in a couple differnt places. I know tagged is the hipper term but that may cause confusion in the glove collecting world. For instance, tagged could also be after fixing a
laked or what you call a glove that has two factory labels.
- shellacked (sp?) - conditioned/preserved with something that permanently looks a little off. I won a great looking light colored suede 1" web on ebay and the guy vaselined it just prior to sending it. I politely suggested that in the future he probably shouldn't alter a glove after it sold, and that vaseline doesn't go well on suede gloves. Of course he pointed me to a website that suggests vaseline on some gloves (mine, which sort of ended the conversation). Sorry for the tangent.
I'm not in love with my first attempt to describe a glove with tattered label,
thrabel. I'm leaning toward
ribbons, but am not quite sold on that one either. Is there a word to describe a tattered battle flag, like old glory but more tattered?