by wjr953 » March 26th, 2008, 10:01 am
jwoody & BretMan,
Thank you for your quick replies, I appreciate it very much. Thanks for the pricing info jwoody. I'm a little surprised that it's listed as "common", this is the first Conigliaro glove like this that I've ever seen. Of course, I haven't been doing this as long as some of the others on the forum. Still, that's very interesting stuff.
Bret, yes the model number actually is "Tony C". For all intents and purposes I would have to say that this looks very much like an XPG that I saw in another photograph on this forum. The obvious differences between that XPG and this glove being that the one I have is a Fastback, Wingback, closed web glove. This glove would appear to be 11-12" in size, but I haven't really measured it yet. I will get some pictures up as soon as I can. I'm thinking that this one would be G or maybe VG, because the outer Rawlings fabric tag is gone, and the inner palm has some very minor "crackling". Also, their is a former owner's name written on the pinky finger (palm side), but that's really very faint. Other than that, the glove is in really nice shape, a beautiful golden color, just a nice piece of leather.
As far as the Wilson A2194 Ball Hawk, I can't really read any name on it, I wish that I could. The only thing I could get from it was up in the pocket, near the bottom of the inner web and that's usually the place where some of the older glove makers listed something referencing the web or the pocket style. I can make out the 2nd word as "Pocket" but there's something listed above it that I can't make out at all. I tried every which way I knew, but I nearly went blind trying to figure it out. You mentioned that the Catalog Sourcebook listed a manufacture date of 1960. That would make this glove 48 years old. The glove is in really nice shape for being that old, and it appears that all the original lacing is intact. I would classify this one as G-VG. It would be a fantastic find if this was in fact a Ned Garver glove, but with the ink being worn off the way it is, I have no way of verifying that with any degree of certainty. I'm going to take another look at it tonight. Guess I'll have to dig out the old magnifying glass. lol This glove also has a patent number and references "Streamlined Fingers". Whoever had it must have used it quite a bit, but also took very good care of it.
Again, thank you both very much for your input gentlemen, I really appreciate your help.
br