William, I'm not aware of those pictures being on anyone else's site. I took a picture of Mike's cabinet the first time I went to Montana. You probably saw it in the Display Gallery below. Numbers two and three (at the beginning) came from photographs Joe sent me. The last pic I got from eBay many years ago and the resolution wasn't that good (small in size). Rob got it from eBay and traded it to Mike a long time ago. I thought I took a better picture of it at Mike's house but I don't see it.
Here's my theory. After going back and researching some patent information, I think it had to be a weak and unsuccessful attempt to get to the padding on the inside - something the laced heel did much more effectively. I think this particular design predates Charles M. King's 1910 "King Patent", which was in fact designed to get at the padding.
"My invention relates to base ball gloves and pertains more particularly to the arrangement and structure of the padding for same and to the means for separably assembling and uniting the inner and outer parts of the glove. The object of my invention is to produce a base ball finger glove comprising an outer cover and an inner lining nesting therein, between the palm portions of which the padding materials may be carried, adapted to be separably united at the adjacent edges of the wrist and back portions, wherby the lining may be removed from the glove, and access had to the interior thereof for adjustment and repair."
The standard 1" web was patented in 1908 and takes on the common form and shape we all know and love so much. This one with a full web and a crescent type padding most definitely predated the King Patent design and I think Charles King took it one step further and patented it. That's my story and I'm sticking with it unless someone can come up with something better. Would love to here all thoughts.
JD
